This is a journal of questions, not answers ... problems, not solutions.
Who is crazy?
How do you define a madman?
One who does not know who is and who sees imaginary things and takes them to reality.
I defy anyone to declare that he is no fool, than this definition.
And anyone who tries to say that is not crazy, I remember that even those declared insane they say the same thing.
In sleep you dream worlds and situations of all kinds and they are taken for reality, then, just "wake up" are recognized as images of the mind, saying it is not known on what basis instead is now in the real world.
If not for a crumb more presence and sharpness of the senses, and the reappearance of a memory that gives the illusion of continuity and remember I wanted to see, there are perceptual differences between the dream and so-called reality of the waking state.
In dreams there is speaking, listening, smelling, touching and all the emotions, feelings and sensations we feel in the "waking state" (and more!)
How science associate perception bodies?
How can, for example, having to depend only on the eyes if, in dreams, we also see with your eyes closed?
"but that is a reworking of the brain ... a simulation of something that is perceived by the brain awake through the eyes" someone might object.
But the same answer can be applied with respect to the waking state: a simulation of something that "another brain" (perhaps that of God, or some sub-god among many others) he received from " awake. "
And if we ask a person of our dreams if he really exists and if it is awake and conscious, he'll probably say yes, and maybe that image starts to laugh if we said that we realized that he is the character of a dream of ours, then "not exist ".
Similarly, with a few enlightened minds or planned to search for the real, no one doubts the existence of himself and others ... almost no one notices that has absolutely nothing that is not only a conviction born from memory (which is only an idea of \u200b\u200brepetition), in order to have verification of a real difference between so-called waking and the state of hallucinatory a dream.
When it happens to notice dreaming while the body sleeps does not have any need to inform of that the characters in his dream, or to verify if they are real or not (because it is not on the reply that if I can confirm), so too the few enlightened minds do not go around proclaiming that the whole universe can only be a sort of dream.
Or that there is no fundamental difference between dream and waking, that these two terms are not synonymous with "unreal or subjective" and "real and objective".
that the mind invents infinite worlds, this is easily asserted, when you wake up in the morning.
Everybody knows that you can fall asleep for a minute and, on waking, feel that they are spending hours and hours, in dreams lasted for days and days.
We are all "crazy", because there is no way to verify that the state in which we are not only subjective hallucination, because even a person who lives in a mental hospital and is said to be Napoleon for himself endless checks (and memories) to confirm his belief.
and memory is fleeting, just as Alzheimer's, a blow to the head, or a bit 'of LSD to be transported in an "other" world.
Maybe even just this article.
What makes us believe to be the memory?
Who are we without memory?
So if the world depends on memory, or that it is our God (who has changed?), then it means that matter and all perceptions are nothing but memory, ever-changing and change, for ever and ever, amen.
The whole Universe is memory / field / vibration / spasm / changing / research / hunger / expression, without a moment's rest, but in deep sleep, and identification with this movement creates' idea of \u200b\u200bliving over time and in space.
Who has the feeling or the certainty of being an individual is only because it has the illusion that individuality is constant, that the person he was yesterday is also today the same ... but it is not so ... everything is different every moment From the instant the above, so there is no moment that follow anyone else, if not for a trick of memory, which is nothing compared to the brain and the consequent alleged correspondence (incorrect, because partial) between two limited perceptions that say "this is me ... this is."
The universe is a stream of perceptions, one after another, unstoppable, relentless, where what gives pleasure creates pain in the 'inevitability, sooner or later, its absence or its opposite.
A continuous action after action that leads to nowhere.
Everything moves, so everything is still ... as a whole, nothing happens.
But who happens across this illusion of movement?
not write any answer to this question (assuming that I know and that can be expressed), because this is a journal of questions and not answers to problems ... and solutions.
0 comments:
Post a Comment